kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: me@tobin.cc (Tobin C. Harding)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: dev process - reduce mistakes
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:03:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925060354.GL32365@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO1P-kBObF0KYNgFkrV9BNr99X0hu2Gt88ishdRPG8hgt5ncMw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:01:19PM -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 9/18/18, Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm after some advice from those more experienced with [kernel]
> > development please.
> >
> > What systems do you have in place to help catch mistakes?  In other
> > words; what processes do you use when coding and submitting patches to
> > help eliminate simple mistakes?  So far my best method is getting a
> > patch [set] ready then waiting until the next day before reviewing the
> > set and submitting.  I am facing an issue where by when doing (less than
> > super interesting) large patch sets (like docs fixes) that by the time I
> > get to the final review my eyes glaze over and I'm still missing
> > mistakes.
> >
> > My future maintainers will thank you ;)
> 
> 
> For the docs part of what you're doing, *I* read what I write out loud
> and deliberately very slowly so that I actually see each word. I
> *empathize* with you. I experience something similar regarding my
> often long winded emails. I'll proofread literally 10 or 15 times then
> see that one last mistake...
> 
> That I MISSED... as the email is disappearing out of sight because it
> has just been sent to a listserv. :D
> 
> Reading out loud **slower** than I normally would helps me see AND
> hear mistakes. If I read at a normal speed, even if I do so out loud,
> it's some kind of a Human nature thing that I'll keep reading my
> mistakes wrongly by mentally "glossing over" those mistakes instead of
> seeing them for the oopsies they are. Instead of catching those
> mistakes and fixing them, I just keep saying them WRONG out loud over
> and over (AND over) if I do so at a normal conversational speaking
> speed. :))
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> Cindy :)

Awesome, thanks Cindy.  Just the sort of tip I was after.

thanks,
Tobin.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18 23:35 dev process - reduce mistakes Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19  0:01 ` valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
2018-09-19  2:15   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19  2:01 ` Cindy-Sue Causey
2018-09-25  6:03   ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180925060354.GL32365@eros \
    --to=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).