From: me@tobin.cc (Tobin C. Harding)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: dev process - reduce mistakes
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:03:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925060354.GL32365@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO1P-kBObF0KYNgFkrV9BNr99X0hu2Gt88ishdRPG8hgt5ncMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:01:19PM -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 9/18/18, Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm after some advice from those more experienced with [kernel]
> > development please.
> >
> > What systems do you have in place to help catch mistakes? In other
> > words; what processes do you use when coding and submitting patches to
> > help eliminate simple mistakes? So far my best method is getting a
> > patch [set] ready then waiting until the next day before reviewing the
> > set and submitting. I am facing an issue where by when doing (less than
> > super interesting) large patch sets (like docs fixes) that by the time I
> > get to the final review my eyes glaze over and I'm still missing
> > mistakes.
> >
> > My future maintainers will thank you ;)
>
>
> For the docs part of what you're doing, *I* read what I write out loud
> and deliberately very slowly so that I actually see each word. I
> *empathize* with you. I experience something similar regarding my
> often long winded emails. I'll proofread literally 10 or 15 times then
> see that one last mistake...
>
> That I MISSED... as the email is disappearing out of sight because it
> has just been sent to a listserv. :D
>
> Reading out loud **slower** than I normally would helps me see AND
> hear mistakes. If I read at a normal speed, even if I do so out loud,
> it's some kind of a Human nature thing that I'll keep reading my
> mistakes wrongly by mentally "glossing over" those mistakes instead of
> seeing them for the oopsies they are. Instead of catching those
> mistakes and fixing them, I just keep saying them WRONG out loud over
> and over (AND over) if I do so at a normal conversational speaking
> speed. :))
>
> Have fun!
>
> Cindy :)
Awesome, thanks Cindy. Just the sort of tip I was after.
thanks,
Tobin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-25 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 23:35 dev process - reduce mistakes Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19 0:01 ` valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
2018-09-19 2:15 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19 2:01 ` Cindy-Sue Causey
2018-09-25 6:03 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180925060354.GL32365@eros \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).