From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC87C73C56 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10552080C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="kfW+XmWb"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="YDtptrF0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B10552080C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hkwG3-0000wo-Og; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:58:35 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hkwG1-0000wN-If for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:58:33 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD50E3F6; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:58:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:58:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=fsqWyM6YhlhAXYPqBQyUXCJTMDX TpKqxVi866VXhPnE=; b=kfW+XmWbaNGEjYAXRAAb/GnZ6Yfx3/ZARsI/ggNkhHw ypEHqQ/V9npek1BZZST5YjrGAMFepBzJQtuH3NeRriXIx/6CETyfOuOR47jJDGD/ mGniE0YgUOH9pv0U1cplo/x18qcyi0zfgC3D4+9cfRJmHJ3Zc/gfZ7yAdzeMekE5 K/eGF0fl60EQOcF0uchNBS9xtywViN00m7cMJxTtH76R1sV8wxf6Hu7EELwrihno KE/iKQBNFqF/pTd/tmpYxCBH/SIt2Qj2XZ/DUKEI/5yXYPVd93UoQlOkKlIpNj+5 tn/U0oJfHS8HIJlzs5J8i1BvxNIaDThirB/IcW66/Tg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=fsqWyM 6YhlhAXYPqBQyUXCJTMDXTpKqxVi866VXhPnE=; b=YDtptrF073gLAaqgUvkICH N6U+V7At/d2lxMpJaPJKkDRO/J5HRt8KgWcv/G0Si/n4zHSu6IucDcwmVDa8igNm LtOsCz6D06EPvwGb5lepD+5a8m9mAKZjQPgOfwmMzk8dsriJULeoMnXjYm4BGWjk /zLWXMoX9PDLebFy1XntiWpFrZ7Ukq+wCpndn5BVzTy2it+gHtr0PN5B1gY5lxGt 1AMGhlwGU0aPAv3X9M3Ru/NCFgE3xPmmatC33wcFnB1ZgADGA/3parmOY1haCaTj lVWcUXbp8xrQPHKPZW4n0E0R/EibwDlWK5V87wDg2sPYUbZMeyvNDRtS/QexjsSg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgeefgddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtre dttdervdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfmjfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheq necukfhppeekfedrkeeirdekledruddtjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepud X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9212C380076; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:58:26 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Muni Sekhar Subject: Re: CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG Message-ID: <20190709195826.GA22280@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernelnewbies X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:54:27PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote: > We use out-of-tree kernel modules in our project and I need to measure the > performance of it by using a bit older gcc version 4.8.5. You are really on your own here, sorry. Please use a modern version of gcc, and then go complain to the vendor that forces you to use out-of-tree kernel modules, as they are the only ones that can support you with them :( Best of luck! greg k-h _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies