From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:16:11 -0500 Subject: Patch Series In-Reply-To: <65fa18ad.43fb.152ed99983e.Coremail.yuzibode@126.com> References: <65fa18ad.43fb.152ed99983e.Coremail.yuzibode@126.com> Message-ID: <21927.1455689771@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org >>> My question is, is it OK to fix all occurrences of error A across the files >> inside drivers/staging/wilc1000 as one patch and all occurrences of error B >> across all files inside drivers/staging/wilc1000 as a second patch? Most maintainers would be perfectly OK with that. And I'm pretty sure that Greg KH (maintainer of drivers/staging) would accept that sort of patch series. If he isn't, I'm sure he'll correct me. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 848 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20160217/5a10b0f8/attachment.bin