From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mueddib@goosey.org (Ozgur Karatas) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:32:12 +0300 Subject: kernel development process question, patch review In-Reply-To: <184861487698185@web28o.yandex.ru> References: <20170221013533.GA23212@eros> <184861487698185@web28o.yandex.ru> Message-ID: <274641487698332@web21h.yandex.ru> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org Hello, I think the list idea is no need for confusion, it is desirable to provide people with a new kernel newbies update to this list with a help and a quick solution to their problems. This is like pre-kernel training. TO and CC already come with the get_maintainer.pl script. TO: Primary responsible CC: development group + kernel mailing list Kernelnewbies = kernelnewbies help Regards, Ozgur > 21.02.2017, 04:44, "Tobin C. Harding" : >> ?If a reviewer makes a suggestion and one intends on making the change >> ?as suggested is it required (normal protocol) to reply stating that >> ?the you understand their suggestion and intend on implementing it or >> ?is this just noise. Should one simply re send the next version of the >> ?patch? >> >> ?Continuing on this theme, should one add a Suggested-by: tag in the >> ?previous situation. Some where Documentation/process it states that no >> ?tag except the CC tag should be added without the authority of the >> ?person being named? >> >> ?thanks, >> ?Tobin.