* Handling I2C eeprom devices
@ 2024-05-17 13:33 Patryk
2024-05-17 16:23 ` Rémi ESSAISSI
2024-05-17 20:31 ` jim.cromie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patryk @ 2024-05-17 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi,
I've got a question regarding how to handle I2C eeprom devices. I see
that in the kernel/drivers/misc/eeprom there are not that many drivers
available. Does it mean that they support various chips that do not
necessarily come from one vendor?
Looking at example at24.c, in the compatible properties I see that all
of them refers to atmel, however when I compared the following
devices: AT24C04C and BRCB008GWZ, at the first glance they look kinda
similar:
- they are organized internally in the same way - 1024 x 8 (8K)
- read/write commands looks the same
I'm not asking you to tell me whether or not it's possible this driver
at24 with the device I need (BRCB008GWZ), rather I would like to get a
suggestion on how to approach this and what factors I should take into
account to make the right decision.
Best regards
Patryk
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling I2C eeprom devices
2024-05-17 13:33 Handling I2C eeprom devices Patryk
@ 2024-05-17 16:23 ` Rémi ESSAISSI
2024-05-17 20:31 ` jim.cromie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rémi ESSAISSI @ 2024-05-17 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Le 17/05/2024 à 15:33, Patryk a écrit :
> Hi,
> I've got a question regarding how to handle I2C eeprom devices. I see
> that in the kernel/drivers/misc/eeprom there are not that many drivers
> available. Does it mean that they support various chips that do not
> necessarily come from one vendor?
> Looking at example at24.c, in the compatible properties I see that all
> of them refers to atmel, however when I compared the following
> devices: AT24C04C and BRCB008GWZ, at the first glance they look kinda
> similar:
> - they are organized internally in the same way - 1024 x 8 (8K)
> - read/write commands looks the same
Those chips may look the "same", but they differ in the magic sequences
to interact with them.
I mean, they have to be exactly the same to work, up to the timing that
has to follow the specs by the milli or micro second for example.
(and sometimes even weird voltages to apply on this or that pin ... )
So your best friend is the Datasheet of your IC delivered by the
vendor/constructor of that chip, that will give you the magic sequences
to interact with it .
Your case should be easy as you already have more than a working
"skeleton" ... .
Regards
>
> I'm not asking you to tell me whether or not it's possible this driver
> at24 with the device I need (BRCB008GWZ), rather I would like to get a
> suggestion on how to approach this and what factors I should take into
> account to make the right decision.
>
> Best regards
> Patryk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling I2C eeprom devices
2024-05-17 13:33 Handling I2C eeprom devices Patryk
2024-05-17 16:23 ` Rémi ESSAISSI
@ 2024-05-17 20:31 ` jim.cromie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jim.cromie @ 2024-05-17 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patryk; +Cc: kernelnewbies
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 7:35 AM Patryk <pbiel7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've got a question regarding how to handle I2C eeprom devices. I see
> that in the kernel/drivers/misc/eeprom there are not that many drivers
> available. Does it mean that they support various chips that do not
> necessarily come from one vendor?
> Looking at example at24.c, in the compatible properties I see that all
> of them refers to atmel, however when I compared the following
> devices: AT24C04C and BRCB008GWZ, at the first glance they look kinda
> similar:
> - they are organized internally in the same way - 1024 x 8 (8K)
> - read/write commands looks the same
>
> I'm not asking you to tell me whether or not it's possible this driver
> at24 with the device I need (BRCB008GWZ), rather I would like to get a
> suggestion on how to approach this and what factors I should take into
> account to make the right decision.
>
> Best regards
> Patryk
>
$ git ls-files | grep eprom | wc -l
89
[jimc@frodo linux.git]$ git ls-files | grep eprom\.h | wc -l
29
[jimc@frodo linux.git]$ git ls-files | grep eprom | grep include
arch/parisc/include/asm/eisa_eeprom.h
arch/sparc/include/asm/eeprom.h
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_eeprom.h
include/linux/eeprom_93cx6.h
include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h
include/linux/spi/eeprom.h
include/media/tveeprom.h
Id look at those headers for similarity,
then the 2 c files in misc for similarity.
also the files under devicetree - thats ALL interface defn
you didnt say if those parts are I2C or SPI or what.
do you have the hardware ?
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-17 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-17 13:33 Handling I2C eeprom devices Patryk
2024-05-17 16:23 ` Rémi ESSAISSI
2024-05-17 20:31 ` jim.cromie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox