From: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srivatsa S. Bhat)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:57:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8E7AF8.3050202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOM9ZoZTK6HqJW4yT2kmXNnDkByMGn+S7KqPF7x+cizJ8pguQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/18/2012 01:38 PM, Arun KS wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail.com
> <mailto:dhylands@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Arun,
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Arun KS <getarunks@gmail.com
> <mailto:getarunks@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Guys,
> >
> > System is working normal after this BUG.
> > PC is at 0x400b4614, probably a mmaped address.
> >
> > Just wondering how can this BUG happen when a process is running
> in user
> > space.
> >
> > Can it be something like this
> > 1) enter to kernel from userspace through some system call.
> > 2) kernel disables the interrupt and return to user space.
>
> Don't do that
>
>
> I don't do that. This scenario mentioned is a just a wild guess.
>
>
> > 3) and now it can happen in user space?
>
> Because something in userspace made a blocking call which would cause
> a context switch to occur and your driver erroneously left interrupts
> disabled.
>
> In that case, my system should have been unstable afterwards if
> interrupts are left disabled. But that is not happening.
>
> If we return to user space with interrupts disabled, can we switch back
> again to kernel using a system cal(because interrupts are already disabled)?
>
Depends on how many CPUs you have - AFAICS the "interrupts disabled"
discussion above applies to a single CPU.. so if you have other CPUs on your
system, you could probably use the system for a little more time.
There is a simple way to check if interrupts are indeed disabled as
hypothesised: turn on the hard-lockup detector (See
Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt for details on what it is and what
config options you have to enable). You can even turn on the soft-lockup
detector and see what you get. Setting the option to panic on hard-lockup/
soft-lockup/hung tasks would be even better, to debug the issue.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CABOM9ZqSazS-NkD980f6sUyy=hk1aLVY+Vjwcxs3mGybvbkgaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-18 6:44 ` BUG: scheduling while atomic Arun KS
2012-04-18 7:31 ` Dave Hylands
2012-04-18 8:08 ` Arun KS
2012-04-18 8:14 ` Dave Hylands
2012-04-18 8:27 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-04-18 8:40 ` Arun KS
2012-04-18 8:58 ` Arun KS
2012-04-18 15:40 ` Dave Hylands
2011-12-05 9:12 Bug:scheduling " sandeep kumar
2011-12-05 19:03 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2011-12-05 19:16 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-10 5:51 BUG: scheduling " sandeep kumar
2011-05-10 6:08 ` Dave Hylands
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8E7AF8.3050202@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).