From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: xerofoify@gmail.com (nick)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:52:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723au: Fix brace coding style issues reported
	by checkpatch
In-Reply-To: <CAO+WgCYKEPiiLGeAnsD26idPO0iVHK=S5E6VTtzS738eK+pZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1414353169-2367-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com>
	<CAL3LdT7HQyW475oghFO2bLv+TO3PNefzxvnotB1J0UR=sF7OQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGpXXZJdzFSmt1D0y+QehujSrasXh=raMr07Nh+j-UZyKJTPdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO+WgCZw2QdDxfN3AQb6MWms5YQahT-zAhw0r9CeSg1RC+bg4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPDOMVhhOq4SHNDcTTTM=7HE_f+=ttftSPocA_qu7bnDvcGhWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO+WgCYKEPiiLGeAnsD26idPO0iVHK=S5E6VTtzS738eK+pZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544FF3F0.10500@gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Hey Greg,
I am trying to improve my code as much as possible now, I really am finally understanding 
how terrible my code was before and I hope never again to make patches that shitty.
Cheers Nick 

On 14-10-28 02:06 PM, Greg Donald wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I actually fixed this to improve code readability not for the kernel
>> rules for your information.
> 
> I know, good job.. and here's to hoping a maintainer picks up your
> patch and applies it to their tree :)
> 
> But I would argue "kernel rules" and "improving code readability" are
> one and the same.  Otherwise checkpatch and it's optional -f needn't
> exist.
> 
>