running queue processes

running queue processes

[Mustafa Hussain]

Is there a way to show processes in running queue only form terminal?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150502/ed3f3afd/attachment.html 

running queue processes

[Nicholas Krause]

On May 2, 2015 11:20:41 AM EDT, Mustafa Hussain <mustafa.hussain93@gmail.com> wrote:
>Is there a way to show processes in running queue only form terminal?
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
I don't remember the exact system call for this but remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need questions like this answered. 
Hope this helps, 
Nick 
>Kernelnewbies mailing list
>Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

running queue processes

[Ruben Safir]

On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need questions like this answered. 


which book?

running queue processes

[Nicholas Krause]

On May 3, 2015 9:16:27 AM EDT, Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> wrote:
>On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux
>programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a
>copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need
>questions like this answered. 
>
>
>which book?
>The book is called the Linux programming interface and the chapters related to this question are chapters 26 or 27 I believe. 
>Kernelnewbies mailing list
>Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

running queue processes

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sun, 3 May 2015, Nicholas Krause wrote:

>
>
> On May 3, 2015 9:16:27 AM EDT, Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> wrote:
> >On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >> remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux
> >programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a
> >copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need
> >questions like this answered.
> >
> >
> >which book?

> >The book is called the Linux programming interface and the chapters
> >related to this question are chapters 26 or 27 I believe.

  nick, this is another reason your contributions to this forum (and
pretty much every other one you're on) are so frequently valueless --
you rarely give a complete or useful answer.

  i suspect the book you're referring to is michael kerrisk's "the
linux programming interface", http://man7.org/tlpi/index.html (a book
to which i have actually contributed corrections,
http://man7.org/tlpi/errata/index.html), which is a reference you
*could* have provided but, instead, you chose to leave just this
maddeningly half-vague reference to a book and some chapter numbers.

  it's an annoying habit with you, nick -- someone asks a well-formed
and specific question and, because you always want to be the first one
to jump in with an answer to burnish your credentials, your reply is
typically something like, "i think there's a system call that does
what you want, you should look it up."

  your eagerness to leap in and be the first one to be helpful
typically means your contributions are vague, vacuous, incomplete and,
in some cases, simply wrong. but rather than take the time to
research the question so that your response is actually *helpful*, you
prefer to contribute little more than, "i think this thing might help
what you're working on, you should check the man page."

  you're not doing your reputation any favours.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

running queue processes

[nick]

On 2015-05-04 04:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2015, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On May 3, 2015 9:16:27 AM EDT, Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>>> remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux
>>> programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a
>>> copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need
>>> questions like this answered.
>>>
>>>
>>> which book?
> 
>>> The book is called the Linux programming interface and the chapters
>>> related to this question are chapters 26 or 27 I believe.
> 
>   nick, this is another reason your contributions to this forum (and
> pretty much every other one you're on) are so frequently valueless --
> you rarely give a complete or useful answer.
> 
>   i suspect the book you're referring to is michael kerrisk's "the
> linux programming interface", http://man7.org/tlpi/index.html (a book
> to which i have actually contributed corrections,
> http://man7.org/tlpi/errata/index.html), which is a reference you
> *could* have provided but, instead, you chose to leave just this
> maddeningly half-vague reference to a book and some chapter numbers.
> 
>   it's an annoying habit with you, nick -- someone asks a well-formed
> and specific question and, because you always want to be the first one
> to jump in with an answer to burnish your credentials, your reply is
> typically something like, "i think there's a system call that does
> what you want, you should look it up."
> 
>   your eagerness to leap in and be the first one to be helpful
> typically means your contributions are vague, vacuous, incomplete and,
> in some cases, simply wrong. but rather than take the time to
> research the question so that your response is actually *helpful*, you
> prefer to contribute little more than, "i think this thing might help
> what you're working on, you should check the man page."
> 
>   you're not doing your reputation any favours.
> 
> rday
>
Rday,
Yet everything I ask a question I get a similar response like do your homework or read more rather
then any help. Clearly I understand with my older questions why but all of my questions now are
similar in nature to this so there is no reason for that.
Nick