From: neikos@neikos.email (Marcel Müller)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Correctly locking a Block Device Request Handler
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:32:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564A0531.6050704@neikos.email> (raw)
Hello everyone,
I'm currently writing a block device driver and got stuck at trying to
understand how to correctly handle the locking
in the reqfn one passes to `blk_init_queue`.
My code looks like this:
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rblk_lock);
/* Code */
static void rblk_request_handler(struct request_queue *q)
__releases(q->queue_lock) __acquires(q->queue_lock)
{
struct request* req;
unsigned long flags = 0;
printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Got request(s) \n");
while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Handling request \n"); // <- Gets
printed
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
blk_end_request_all(req, -ENOTTY);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Handled request \n"); // <- Does not
get printed
}
}
static in rblk_init() {
/* Get major number, allocate devices */
for (i = 0; i < rblk_cnt; i++) { // For each device
/* alloc_disk, check for allocation fail */
disk->queue = blk_init_queue(rblk_request_handler, &rblk_lock);
}
}
This didn't work, and it was obvious to me that it was hanging in the
spinlock. So I tried
removing the locking, (this SO answer says that the queue is already
locked:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19418979/proper-way-to-lock-the-queue-in-a-block-device-driver-while-serving-requests)
however, I still get the problem that the queue locks up and the second
message never hits the message
queue.
What /does/ work is if I invert the order of locking. As in, unlock
first, end_request and then lock again.
However that doesn't seem to be the correct way. What am I doing
completely wrong, what did I misunderstand?
Full code: https://gist.github.com/TheNeikos/8798788defa1a9f316e6
Thanks
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 16:32 Marcel Müller [this message]
2015-11-18 6:11 ` Correctly locking a Block Device Request Handler Pranay Srivastava
2015-11-19 13:56 ` Marcel Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564A0531.6050704@neikos.email \
--to=neikos@neikos.email \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).