kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: neikos@neikos.email (Marcel Müller)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Correctly locking a Block Device Request Handler
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:32:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564A0531.6050704@neikos.email> (raw)

Hello everyone,

I'm currently writing a block device driver and got stuck at trying to
understand how to correctly handle the locking
in the reqfn one passes to `blk_init_queue`.

My code looks like this:

    static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rblk_lock);

    /* Code */

    static void rblk_request_handler(struct request_queue *q)
    __releases(q->queue_lock) __acquires(q->queue_lock)
    {
        struct request* req;
        unsigned long flags = 0;
   
        printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Got request(s) \n");
        while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
            printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Handling request \n"); // <- Gets
printed
            spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
            blk_end_request_all(req, -ENOTTY);
            spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
            printk(KERN_INFO "rblk: Handled request \n"); // <- Does not
get printed
        }
    }


    static in rblk_init() {
        /* Get major number, allocate devices */
        for (i = 0; i < rblk_cnt; i++) { // For each device
            /* alloc_disk, check for allocation fail */

            disk->queue = blk_init_queue(rblk_request_handler, &rblk_lock);
        }
    }


This didn't work, and it was obvious to me that it was hanging in the
spinlock. So I tried
removing the locking, (this SO answer says that the queue is already
locked:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19418979/proper-way-to-lock-the-queue-in-a-block-device-driver-while-serving-requests)
however, I still get the problem that the queue locks up and the second
message never hits the message
queue.

What /does/ work is if I invert the order of locking. As in, unlock
first, end_request and then lock again.
However that doesn't seem to be the correct way. What am I doing
completely wrong, what did I misunderstand?

Full code: https://gist.github.com/TheNeikos/8798788defa1a9f316e6

Thanks

             reply	other threads:[~2015-11-16 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 16:32 Marcel Müller [this message]
2015-11-18  6:11 ` Correctly locking a Block Device Request Handler Pranay Srivastava
2015-11-19 13:56   ` Marcel Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564A0531.6050704@neikos.email \
    --to=neikos@neikos.email \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).