From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu) Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:26:32 -0400 Subject: Is there mailist about LSM In-Reply-To: <1527704011.1098198.1390804752.297ADD3D@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1527700573.1073529.1390735608.275C3A8D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56012.1527701120@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1527701845.1082359.1390760976.092478F1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <65026.1527703555@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1527704011.1098198.1390804752.297ADD3D@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <69732.1527704792@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org On Wed, 30 May 2018 11:13:31 -0700, Alexander Ivanov said: > > There's some support for one "large" LSM and a "trivial" one like yama. > > What this some support would be then? Basically, there's a pointer for an LSM-private blob, and no support for a chain of blobs. > Suppose I have stateless LSM, don't really interested in using any objects' blobs. Congrats. You just re-invented YAMA. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 486 bytes Desc: not available URL: