From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dev@snitselaar.org (Jerry Snitselaar) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:10:22 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <877fvzx9g1.fsf@snitselaar.org> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org On 2015-02-02 13:03 MST, Tolga Ceylan wrote: > I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge. > > Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail > for proof and another kernel patch e-mail... > > I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in > kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you > who are taking this challenge... > > I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system > takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's > no outlet for process related questions such as mine below. > > All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch > itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails. > > It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related > questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email. > > Cheers, > Tolga Did you try emailing little with the process questions? Process questions should get answered there as well as questions regarding the tasks. It might take some time to get a response, but eventually you will. Regards, Jerry