From: bjorn@mork.no (Bjørn Mork)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Wait times for patch submission
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:29:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k30zps93.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC+QLdT-8LeYdRGHsjpYjY-HByb+b6Ty6f=WHLw2JWhc8pSi3A@mail.gmail.com> (Mandeep Sandhu's message of "Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:31:53 -0800")
Mandeep Sandhu <mandeepsandhu.chd@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to check with ppl who frequently post patches to LKML on how
> long should one should wait before resending the patches in case
> there's no response to them.
That depends on lots of factors. Like how important the patch is, what
kind of patch management system the maintainer uses, etc, etc.
> I had sent a patch on Greg KH's staging-next tree, on 16 Dec '14 to
> LKML and the relevant maintainers.
>
> I got a mail from Greg's friendly bot stating that the branch was
> closed and that the patches will be looked at once the merge window
> closes.
Which usually (always?) is true. Note that "once the merge window
closes" doesn't necessarily mean within days after -rc1. It might mean
a few weeks if the maintainer is busy doing other stuff, like travelling
etc. And maintainers are always busy :-)
Some maintainers even have a life, which implies taking time off with
their family at this time of the year. You should therefore give them a
week or two extra slack.
And no, this does not count as "no response". You got a reply giving a
precise description of how your patches will be handled and what you
need to do.
> Do I need to resend the patches again or will they be picked up from
> the maintainer's queue?
They will most likely be picked up as promised, and you'll get another
mail telling you which tree they were added to.
I would wait until at least -rc5 in any case before considering a
repost of something destined for the next release. That still leaves
plenty of time before the next merge window opens.
Bj?rn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 19:31 Wait times for patch submission Mandeep Sandhu
2015-01-06 20:24 ` Greg KH
2015-01-06 21:24 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2015-01-06 22:12 ` Greg KH
2015-01-06 22:31 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2015-01-06 20:29 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2015-01-06 21:26 ` Mandeep Sandhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k30zps93.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).