From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com (Mulyadi Santosa)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:39:34 +0700
Subject: adding a system call
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin+JX3d4cz0U=_DxLNyja_a1k0YFGKvGOnkBDk7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=1wH+uVCPEGhXB7_UnAQp61ayKO6vee5Lg7GaD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin_GxoXJai071w81mgkVeCX6awTsYFrvccXHOWE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimNcnZDO9aDKyuJaQJPnvAcKwmrvNFB1wV-CF4L@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinYJLdKJ2KftXV=7mgtOF2sj=n2gFpoXrAymwbm@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikvG0rHERrE7ncePMC2QTNT84wf-RUJSDqVwGB1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin+JX3d4cz0U=_DxLNyja_a1k0YFGKvGOnkBDk7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=4ayo61F71RvWukiA8uZgOB5OcZcxrSA2_O8os@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:19, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> and i added:
> 1. #define __NR_hariohm 264
> __SYSCALL(__NR_hariohm, sys_hariohm) in unistd.h file.

grepping inside unistd.h, I got

#undef __NR_syscalls
#define __NR_syscalls 264

So, it seems that you violate one rule: you add a syscall but didn't
increase the  number of total syscalls registered.

Am I right or am I right?

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com