From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com (Mulyadi Santosa)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:19:20 +0700
Subject: Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via
	kernelnewbies
In-Reply-To: <4E0B38BD.1090201@surriel.com>
References: <BANLkTinSLR-h1FhVX8HGp6MPaTm+yGp5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=D0wrpdDs1F3i=64SYuYkWMnyEdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinp6F9_AYwj0SpUgS_pXX4GRAz+Rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0B1E56.7090602@surriel.com>
	<BANLkTimgkfm5-LcS5EbKzxAjmsDX_=kF2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0B38BD.1090201@surriel.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=1+HHUbOLbaW-OvAerMfLZ4K5mUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Hi Rik...

Long time no chat :)

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 21:37, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> wrote:
> You've got to be kidding me.
>
> SPF is fundamentally flawed in so many ways, noone should
> be recommending it in this day and age.

So, what do you recommend about this issue? Should we just bear with it?


-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com