From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com (Mulyadi Santosa)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:16:05 +0700
Subject: Basic HighMeM Question
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=LnTgK9_7C7WowRz4B96kEdt-Z-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikYk=wRADbEpsyGRPZ18LQP9q-xNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=Jtp0K912N6ceg1Kgq_k5E9jRJBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinp6_n0z6OAzo1R6sq_nLynyo_3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim4i2Ar+eGyYOBQaMtvCKcwCWb5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=LnTgK9_7C7WowRz4B96kEdt-Z-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=yTsMbt51GNFKUOqCkNd7j8bRawQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Is it okay to jump in, guys?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:51, piyush moghe <pmkernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Prabhu.
> So does this means that this ZONE_NORMAL limit of 896MB is because of 3:1
> memory division?

partly yes, plus 896 MB itself is due to some reservation in kernel
address space such as vmalloc, fixmap etc.

> If it is do then does this mean that if this ratio is changed then
> ZONE_NORMAL limit will also be changed?

see above...
-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com