* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
@ 2011-06-29 9:48 Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 9:56 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 10:00 ` Felix Varghese
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-29 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi All,
I'm using gmail.com for corresponding to this mailing list.
Recently I have observed that gmail has started complaining about the
authenticity of the sender.
Eg: I see this message quite often when someone replies to a kernewbies post:
This message may not have been sent by: xyz at gmail.com
Is anyone else seeing this too?
I think mailing lists set a "via" (or some such) header in the mail to
indicate that the mail is being sent on behalf of the original sender.
Could that be missing?
-mandeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 9:48 Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies Mandeep Sandhu
@ 2011-06-29 9:56 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 11:00 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 10:00 ` Felix Varghese
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2011-06-29 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:48, Mandeep Sandhu
<mandeepsandhu.chd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using gmail.com for corresponding to this mailing list.
>
> Recently I have observed that gmail has started complaining about the
> authenticity of the sender.
same thing here....I guess, there is a header mangling somewhere done
by the mailing list program?
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 9:48 Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 9:56 ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2011-06-29 10:00 ` Felix Varghese
2011-06-29 10:59 ` Mandeep Sandhu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Felix Varghese @ 2011-06-29 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On 29 June 2011 15:18, Mandeep Sandhu <mandeepsandhu.chd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using gmail.com for corresponding to this mailing list.
>
> Recently I have observed that gmail has started complaining about the
> authenticity of the sender.
>
> Eg: I see this message quite often when someone replies to a kernewbies post:
>
> This message may not have been sent by: xyz at gmail.com
>
> Is anyone else seeing this too?
>
> I think mailing lists set a "via" (or some such) header in the mail to
> indicate that the mail is being sent on behalf of the original sender.
> Could that be missing?
Yes, I'm seeing this too. Seems like gmail introduced this particular
feature(?) recently. The warning is technically correct, isn't it? You
did not send this message to me - kernelnewbies did! Maybe they
overlooked (or don't care about) the fact that mailing lists broadcast
messages on behalf of the original sender. Or maybe something will
have to change in the way the kernelnewbies mailing list sends out its
messages.
Regards,
Felix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 10:00 ` Felix Varghese
@ 2011-06-29 10:59 ` Mandeep Sandhu
[not found] ` <BANLkTin=ZJk_U4JZWrOTUrpxM6HxsbMseQ@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-29 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
> Yes, I'm seeing this too. Seems like gmail introduced this particular
> feature(?) recently. The warning is technically correct, isn't it? You
Yes. Gmail seems to be doing the right thing.
> overlooked (or don't care about) the fact that mailing lists broadcast
> messages on behalf of the original sender. Or maybe something will
I think Gmail is pretty 'mailing list' aware. I have filters
specifically for mailing list (like this).
Looks like the kernelnewbies list is not adding the 'via' header to
the mails (I don't know the correct 'technical name for it :))
Maybe the list admin can throw some light on this issue?
-mandeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 9:56 ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2011-06-29 11:00 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 11:04 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 12:45 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-29 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
> same thing here....I guess, there is a header mangling somewhere done
> by the mailing list program?
Yup. Looks like some settings changed on the kernelnewbies mail server.
-mandeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 11:00 ` Mandeep Sandhu
@ 2011-06-29 11:04 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 11:07 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 12:45 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-29 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mandeep Sandhu
<mandeepsandhu.chd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> same thing here....I guess, there is a header mangling somewhere done
>> by the mailing list program?
Here's a google link explaining 'via' header:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=1311182
This also seems to be a recent addition to gmail. So I'm not sure if
anything has changed on the kernelnewbiews mail server end. This
warning might be a result og gmail rolling out this new header check.
HTH,
-mandeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 11:04 ` Mandeep Sandhu
@ 2011-06-29 11:07 ` Mulyadi Santosa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2011-06-29 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi all
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 18:04, Mandeep Sandhu
<mandeepsandhu.chd@gmail.com> wrote:
> This also seems to be a recent addition to gmail. So I'm not sure if
> anything has changed on the kernelnewbiews mail server end. This
> warning might be a result og gmail rolling out this new header check.
yeah, looks like gmail puts few new stuffs quite recently, like a new
"people involved in discussion" we see right of message pan.
OK, we need to tell Rik van Riel ... RIk, hope you notice this man....
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
[not found] ` <BANLkTin=ZJk_U4JZWrOTUrpxM6HxsbMseQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-06-29 11:50 ` Mandeep Sandhu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-29 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
> It's not only this list. ?There are other lists which are reporting
> the same message.
Some lists already seem to be handling this correctly. eg: I'm
subscribed to the DBUS mailing lists...so mails sent there come like
this:
XYZ via lists.freedesktop.org to dbus
-mandeep
>
> Sunny
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 11:00 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 11:04 ` Mandeep Sandhu
@ 2011-06-29 12:45 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 14:28 ` Prashant Shah
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2011-06-29 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On 06/29/2011 07:00 AM, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
>> same thing here....I guess, there is a header mangling somewhere done
>> by the mailing list program?
>
> Yup. Looks like some settings changed on the kernelnewbies mail server.
I did not make any configuration changes on this side
in the past few months.
The last update to the mailman package is from February,
so a software update isn't the problem, either.
Did Gmail make changes perhaps?
--
All rights reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 12:45 ` Rik van Riel
@ 2011-06-29 14:28 ` Prashant Shah
2011-06-29 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Prashant Shah @ 2011-06-29 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> wrote:
>
> Did Gmail make changes perhaps?
>
just a wild guess. maybe something related to SPF
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=185812
I know that the message was really sent by the sender. What can I do?
Many small senders don't follow good sending practices and do not
provide authentication information. This can lead to incoming emails
being misclassified as spam, and it can also attract spammers who use
the sender's name to send out spam.
We recommend contacting the sender of the email and encouraging them
to authenticate their messages by publishing a SPF record.
SPF records should also be published in DNS as type SPF records.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 14:28 ` Prashant Shah
@ 2011-06-29 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 17:19 ` Mulyadi Santosa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2011-06-29 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On 06/29/2011 10:28 AM, Prashant Shah wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Rik van Riel<riel@surriel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Did Gmail make changes perhaps?
>>
>
> just a wild guess. maybe something related to SPF
>
> http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=185812
>
> I know that the message was really sent by the sender. What can I do?
> Many small senders don't follow good sending practices and do not
> provide authentication information. This can lead to incoming emails
> being misclassified as spam, and it can also attract spammers who use
> the sender's name to send out spam.
>
> We recommend contacting the sender of the email and encouraging them
> to authenticate their messages by publishing a SPF record.
>
> SPF records should also be published in DNS as type SPF records.
You've got to be kidding me.
SPF is fundamentally flawed in so many ways, noone should
be recommending it in this day and age.
--
All rights reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
@ 2011-06-29 17:19 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 18:42 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2011-06-29 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi Rik...
Long time no chat :)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 21:37, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> wrote:
> You've got to be kidding me.
>
> SPF is fundamentally flawed in so many ways, noone should
> be recommending it in this day and age.
So, what do you recommend about this issue? Should we just bear with it?
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 17:19 ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2011-06-29 18:42 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 21:19 ` julie Sullivan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2011-06-29 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On 06/29/2011 01:19 PM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi Rik...
>
> Long time no chat :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 21:37, Rik van Riel<riel@surriel.com> wrote:
>> You've got to be kidding me.
>>
>> SPF is fundamentally flawed in so many ways, noone should
>> be recommending it in this day and age.
>
> So, what do you recommend about this issue? Should we just bear with it?
At some point I will upgrade kernelnewbies.org to a RHEL 6
virtual machine, with newer versions of everything.
Right now I am very busy with other things though, so it'll
be a few months before I get around to it...
--
All rights reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 18:42 ` Rik van Riel
@ 2011-06-29 21:19 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-29 21:25 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-30 5:07 ` Mandeep Sandhu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: julie Sullivan @ 2011-06-29 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi list,
I've looked on a couple of the other kernel mailing lists I'm
following too and 'This message may not have been sent by:' is not
appearing there, just the 'blah.com via mailinglist.org' thingie (even
for .gmail.com addresses).
Btw just to make sure .gmail.com mails on kernelnewbies haven't been
peculiarly marked with strange metadata somewhere, I checked my
kernelnewbies messages via Kmail and they're not, the 'warning' only
appears when reading them using Gmail.
I'm sure we can put up with it for a few months until Rik has time to
upgrade, I for one am getting a bit inured to Gmail's ever-expanding
collection of idiosyncrasies... :-/
Cheers
Julie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 21:19 ` julie Sullivan
@ 2011-06-29 21:25 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-30 5:07 ` Mandeep Sandhu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: julie Sullivan @ 2011-06-29 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Oh, and I just noticed that I can't see the 'This message may not have
been sent by:' on the mail I just sent before - presumably because my
Gmail account knows I'm me. Hooray.
:-)
Cheers
Julie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies
2011-06-29 21:19 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-29 21:25 ` julie Sullivan
@ 2011-06-30 5:07 ` Mandeep Sandhu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mandeep Sandhu @ 2011-06-30 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:49 AM, julie Sullivan
<kernelmail.jms@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've looked on a couple of the other kernel mailing lists I'm
> following too and 'This message may not have been sent by:' is not
> appearing there, just the 'blah.com via mailinglist.org' thingie (even
> for .gmail.com addresses).
>
> Btw just to make sure .gmail.com mails on kernelnewbies haven't been
> peculiarly marked with strange metadata somewhere, I checked my
> kernelnewbies messages via Kmail and they're not, the 'warning' only
> appears when reading them using Gmail.
>
> I'm sure we can put up with it for a few months until Rik has time to
> upgrade, I for one am getting a bit inured to Gmail's ever-expanding
> collection of idiosyncrasies... :-/
Agreed. This is no biggie, as it's nothing more than a warning.
-mandeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-30 5:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-29 9:48 Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received via kernelnewbies Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 9:56 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 11:00 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 11:04 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 11:07 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 12:45 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 14:28 ` Prashant Shah
2011-06-29 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 17:19 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-29 18:42 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-29 21:19 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-29 21:25 ` julie Sullivan
2011-06-30 5:07 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2011-06-29 10:00 ` Felix Varghese
2011-06-29 10:59 ` Mandeep Sandhu
[not found] ` <BANLkTin=ZJk_U4JZWrOTUrpxM6HxsbMseQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-29 11:50 ` Mandeep Sandhu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).