surviving in lkml

surviving in lkml

[Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar]

Hi list,
This is an interesting story/presentation by an lkml regular, not technical
but useful.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B8baQh2SFt66N2Q3M2FkMzYtZmRjYi00NTEzLWEwZWYtOTEzMDk5MzhkOTQ1&hl=en_US&pli=1

Regards
Anuz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110602/4408a598/attachment.html 

surviving in lkml

[João Eduardo Luís]

Quite nice presentation. Although I was hoping to see something stating the correct protocol to repost a question to the list, either because the previous one was ignored or just went by unnoticed.

Then again, I feel blessed because I either find the answer by myself, although most times when it is no longer required, or I'm able to simply work around the problem.

Cheers.

---
Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s
gpg key: 477C26E5 from pool.keyserver.eu 





On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:

> Hi list,
> This is an interesting story/presentation by an lkml regular, not technical but useful. 
>  
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B8baQh2SFt66N2Q3M2FkMzYtZmRjYi00NTEzLWEwZWYtOTEzMDk5MzhkOTQ1&hl=en_US&pli=1
> 
> Regards
> Anuz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110602/10e18710/attachment.bin 

surviving in lkml

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:51:45AM +0100, Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s wrote:
> Quite nice presentation. Although I was hoping to see something
> stating the correct protocol to repost a question to the list, either
> because the previous one was ignored or just went by unnoticed.

Just resend it.

surviving in lkml

[Stéphan Gorget]

uh, it is written "Sorry, we are unable to retrieve the document for
viewing or you don't have permission to view the document." is there
sthg wrong ?

--
St?phan Gorget

surviving in lkml

[Althaf]

That was an interesting share, it would nice to see a lkml-user-wiki to keep
a log of lkml experience.

-
/althaf k backer/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110602/74dd9171/attachment.html 

surviving in lkml

[João Eduardo Luís]

On Jun 2, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Greg KH wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:51:45AM +0100, Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s wrote:
>> Quite nice presentation. Although I was hoping to see something
>> stating the correct protocol to repost a question to the list, either
>> because the previous one was ignored or just went by unnoticed.
> 
> Just resend it.
> 
> 


Fair enough.

Will do that, expecting not to be marked as spam by everybody whenever I'm way too persistent with something. :-)

---
Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s
gpg key: 477C26E5 from pool.keyserver.eu 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110602/fdd6f609/attachment.bin 

surviving in lkml

[Greg Freemyer]

2011/6/2 Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s <jecluis@gmail.com>:
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:51:45AM +0100, Jo?o Eduardo Lu?s wrote:
>>> Quite nice presentation. Although I was hoping to see something
>>> stating the correct protocol to repost a question to the list, either
>>> because the previous one was ignored or just went by unnoticed.
>>
>> Just resend it.
>>
>>
>
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Will do that, expecting not to be marked as spam by everybody whenever I'm way too persistent with something. :-)

I don't follow lkml per se, but on the lkml associated lists I follow,
people tend to wait at least a week, and sometimes several weeks.

Then they just reply to the original email with "ping, any feedback on
this?", or some other short message.

Especially if you need a specific developer to look at something, or
add it to their set of patches, it can take a while before they have
time to review your patch.

Greg