kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dhylands@gmail.com (Dave Hylands)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: VMA of processes and CPU registers
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:30:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikbsfu7s_XL16_0fJrJNShn=YNspQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SNT111-DS139832BD4CC4EAD1B5B77EA7930@phx.gbl>

Hi John,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:01 AM, limp <johnkyr83@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Dace and Vladimir for your replies.
>
> First of all, I forgot to mention that I am talking for x86 architecture.

I think that this is true for all of the architectures I've worked
with (ARM, MIPS, x86). Some architectures (like MIPS) have a
combination of spaces which are linearly mapped between virtual and
physical, and mapped spaces (which go through an MMU). ARM can switch
back and forth by enabling and disabling the MMU, but when running
under linux, the MMU is always on.

>> The CPU registers will contain the virtual addresses. Each and every
>> time that the CPU tries to access a virtual memory location, then the
>> address will be translated by the MMU into a physical address.
>
> So, AFAIU the translation to physical memory takes place *only* when the ALU
> of the processor has to do some operation which has memory operands (in
> this case the CPU needs to deal with the *real* addresses) but not prior to
> that.
>
> Now if, for example, EIP has the value of 0xB71B13E8 and I know that on
> B70CC000-B71B7000 the libX11.so is linked, then the IP points to the 0xE53E8
> (0xB71B13E8 - B70CC000) offset of libX11.so? Is that right?

Correct.

-- 
Dave Hylands
Shuswap, BC, Canada
http://www.davehylands.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-20 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-19 22:56 VMA of processes and CPU registers limp
2011-04-19 23:20 ` Dave Hylands
2011-04-20 11:01   ` limp
2011-04-20 16:03     ` mindentropy
2011-04-25  8:55       ` Prabhu nath
2011-04-25 16:38         ` mindentropy
2011-04-27  4:33           ` Prabhu nath
2011-04-27  4:48             ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-04-27 18:30             ` mindentropy
2011-04-20 17:30     ` Dave Hylands [this message]
2011-04-20 18:08       ` mindentropy
2011-04-21  1:22         ` Dave Hylands
2011-04-21 19:54           ` mindentropy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTikbsfu7s_XL16_0fJrJNShn=YNspQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dhylands@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).