From: anupam.kapoor@gmail.com (Anupam Kapoor)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Disabling nagle algorithm
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin7HRAuiHUnsQuxrf3iKZrJx04ZcA@mail.gmail.com>
yet another option would be to setup point-to-point ethernet device
(^^) via tun/tap drivers. you can have a userland program receiving
data from the said device, and then use whatever options you want
there.
anupam
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Anupam Kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com> wrote:
> yup, that's what i also think. is it possible that nagle+delayed-ack
> is causing the perceived slow-down ?
>
> anupam
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> frankly it is not wise to disable nagle, and the solution i proposed
>> (using netfilter extension) is really too tedious - the added overhead
>> may slow down the processing, even though disabling nagle aims to
>> improve latencies. ? but modern network card is so fast, that the
>> bottleneck is not at the network card side, but more likely in the
>> network gateway, or router side - so u are definitely not going to see
>> improvement in spite of all the troubles.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Peter Teoh
>>
>
>
>
> --
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
>
--
In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
Emacs was the lambda.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-29 17:34 Disabling nagle algorithm C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 3:48 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30 3:51 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 4:23 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30 4:47 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 7:39 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30 8:07 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 8:34 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30 13:48 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-31 0:33 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-31 2:41 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-31 2:54 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-01 5:31 ` Anupam Kapoor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=anupam.kapoor@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).