kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anupam.kapoor@gmail.com (Anupam Kapoor)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Disabling nagle algorithm
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin7HRAuiHUnsQuxrf3iKZrJx04ZcA@mail.gmail.com>

yet another option would be to setup point-to-point ethernet device
(^^) via tun/tap drivers. you can have a userland program receiving
data from the said device, and then use whatever options you want
there.

anupam

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Anupam Kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com> wrote:
> yup, that's what i also think. is it possible that nagle+delayed-ack
> is causing the perceived slow-down ?
>
> anupam
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> frankly it is not wise to disable nagle, and the solution i proposed
>> (using netfilter extension) is really too tedious - the added overhead
>> may slow down the processing, even though disabling nagle aims to
>> improve latencies. ? but modern network card is so fast, that the
>> bottleneck is not at the network card side, but more likely in the
>> network gateway, or router side - so u are definitely not going to see
>> improvement in spite of all the troubles.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Peter Teoh
>>
>
>
>
> --
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
>



-- 
In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
Emacs was the lambda.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-01  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-29 17:34 Disabling nagle algorithm C K Kashyap
2011-05-30  3:48 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30  3:51   ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30  4:23     ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30  4:47       ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30  7:39         ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30  8:07           ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30  8:34             ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30 13:48               ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-31  0:33                 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-31  2:41                   ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-31  2:54                     ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-01  5:31                     ` Anupam Kapoor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=anupam.kapoor@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).