kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: miloody@gmail.com (loody)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: about 64-bits division in kernel
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:51:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimkyaqLJZ1C9_gtjsVcctUhhA+RrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinjDOR57PydHKxpHbcG6umgjJEifQ@mail.gmail.com>

hi Dave:
Thanks for your kind reply.
2011/5/20 Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail.com>:
> Hi lody,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM, loody <miloody@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi all:
>> My platform is 32-bits cpu and I need following calculation in my driver.
>> #define longdiv(sr1, sr2, div) ? ? ?(unsigned long )((((unsigned long
>> long)(sr1) << 32) ^ (sr2)) / (div))
>>
>> my question are:
>> 1. why "__udivdi3" has any relationship with above calculation?
>
> Because you're doing 64 bit arithmetic (unsigned long long) and 64 bit
> division is not supported in all kernels.

why the name "__udivdi3" has relation to 64-bits arighmetic?
Why linker ask for "__udivdi3", it seems there is a common sense for
linker that when doing 64-bits calculation it will try to find
"__udivdi3", am i right?

>
>> 2. I know the above calculation is implemented in clibc, but why
>> kernel still implement itself?
>> ? ? why kernel try to make another wheel instead of including what
>> clib provided ?
>
> The kernel doesn't use anything from the C runtime ?library at all.
>
> 64-bit division and floating point are 2 things not supported in the
> kernel, although they do happen to word on some platforms, they aren't
> portable operations.
>
the 64-bit division seem supported in gcc toolchain, and gcc will take
care the platform issue when we cross-compile the gcc, right?
It should be safe to static link the 64bits division in gcc.

-- 
Regards,

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  3:34 about 64-bits division in kernel loody
2011-05-20  4:15 ` Dave Hylands
2011-05-20  5:51   ` loody [this message]
2011-05-20  6:47     ` Dave Hylands
2011-05-21  6:57       ` loody
2011-05-21  7:22         ` Dave Hylands

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimkyaqLJZ1C9_gtjsVcctUhhA+RrA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miloody@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).