From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rameshpa@gmail.com (Ramesh.P)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:06:09 -0700
Subject: process stack
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimvSuCKvJK97__SAhTvWbry_CpRJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikwOqOYNV7Y9mcY5E=OrM1QGy-Jgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimvSuCKvJK97__SAhTvWbry_CpRJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTimuqC5wM6L3c0MC40R0MM3bv4f73w@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Asutosh Das <das.asutosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27 June 2011 09:04, Venkateswarlu P <p.venkatesh551@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Each process is having a stack .
>>
>> In C ,for local variables allocation? this stack? is used (for some extra
>> usage also).
>>
>> what about static and global data allocation ?
>
>
> it goes into BSS (no explicit initialization)

I think static/global variables (in BSS) without explicit initializer
are initialized to zero (null for pointer types).

>>
>> where this data? will be allocated ?.
>>
>>
>> what? about dynamic memory allocation ?
>
> goes into heap
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Warm Regards,
> Asutosh Das
> # (91) 9049 000 969
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>
>