* two questions about test_and_clear_bit()
@ 2011-05-06 2:01 Parmenides
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Parmenides @ 2011-05-06 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi,
For the following function, I have two questions:
static inline int test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
{
int oldbit;
__asm__ __volatile__( LOCK_PREFIX
"btsl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
:"=r" (oldbit),"+m" (ADDR)
:"Ir" (nr) : "memory");
return oldbit;
}
1. There are two instructions in the inline assemably, namely btsl and
sbbl. But, can the only one LOCK_PREFIX ensure that the operation is
atomic?
2. The clobber list of the inline assembly contains a string of
"memory". What is the meaning of this declaration and why does the
operation need it ? After all, some other operations such as
clear_bit() dose not need "memory" indeed. The declaration of "memory"
appears in source code of kernel here and there, and bothers me for a
long time. So any details about it will be appreciated.
static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
{
__asm__ __volatile__( LOCK_PREFIX
"btrl %1,%0"
:"+m" (ADDR)
:"Ir" (nr));
}
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-05-06 2:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-06 2:01 two questions about test_and_clear_bit() Parmenides
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).