From: rahulimpdocs@gmail.com (Rahul Bhattacharya)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Changing RT task to a different cgroup
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:21:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+f8H1DbdTGtwgv1e5dzDXAV32HfYEq=SPEfemBbeB4mpGoS1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
When I try to move a RT task to a different cgroup(shown below) I get
a EINVAL error.
However I can change the cgroup first and then change the sched policy.
After looking into kernel source code(*I dont use
CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED config*) I was able to extract this piece of
logic
*chrt -p 777*
pid 777's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
pid 777's current scheduling priority: 0
*cat /proc/777/cgroup*
2:cpu,cpuacct:/system.slice
1:name=systemd:/system.slice/d.service
*chrt -f -p 50 777*
root at mgu-high:~# chrt -p 777
pid 777's current scheduling policy: SCHED_FIFO
pid 777's current scheduling priority: 50
*/bin/echo 777>/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/interaction.slice/tasks**echo:
write error: Invalid argument*
After browsing kernel sources I was able to find out the reason of failure.
static int cpu_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
struct task_struct *task;
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, tset) {
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
if (!sched_rt_can_attach(css_tg(css), task))
return -EINVAL;
#else
*/* We don't support RT-tasks being in separate groups */ if
(task->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) { return -EINVAL; }*
#endif
}
return 0;
}
My question is why is this check required? Also, changing cgroups
first and then the policy of FIFO works without issue(?) for the task.
Thanks
br
rb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20160914/6b44141e/attachment.html
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 15:21 Rahul Bhattacharya [this message]
2016-09-20 12:39 ` Changing RT task to a different cgroup Rahul Bhattacharya
2016-09-20 13:09 ` Juan Luis De Sousa-Valadas Castano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+f8H1DbdTGtwgv1e5dzDXAV32HfYEq=SPEfemBbeB4mpGoS1Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rahulimpdocs@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).