kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: murzin.v@gmail.com (Vladimir Murzin)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Memory barrier
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABV+yWsF66_dcSO479VBua=8b_sPwMNN2-oCF8r2ov9H9cXwSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU156-W232EAF6D30A91D540DD788BCB90@phx.gbl>

Hi,

In my opinion it is not correct to say "make order on current CPU" in
case of SMP. Actually, we cope with shared resource here - memory, and
observes for that resource - CPUs.

As soon as CPU is asked to make a barrier (with some sort of
instruction) access to shared resource is ordered among all of
observers. So, in case of SMP we have to protect shared resource with
"hardware" memory barriers. In case of UP, memory is not shared, so,
generally, we have to take care that memory access won't be optimized
by compiler.

P.S.
Sorry for digging this thread.

Best wishes
Vladimir Murzin

On 12/9/11, ??? <buyit@live.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi :
>
>       if you write code as below:
>
> golbal int in1=0,int2=0;
>
> cpu1:                     cpu2:
>
> int1 = 1;                 b= int2;
> smp_wmb()
> int2 = 2;                 a = in1;
>
> cpu2 may get the result: b==2 & a==0 , which means although cpu1 set int1=1
> before int2=2, there is no garentee for cpu2 to perceive int1 before int2.
> you must add smp_rmb() inside cpu2 to prevent this.
>
> two cpus must cooperate to acheive the sequence memory order.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:14:37 +0530
>> Subject: Re: Memory barrier
>> From: trisha1march at gmail.com
>> To: buyit at live.cn
>> CC: kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>>
>> I will add more info here:
>> smp_mb()
>> Similar to mb(), but only guarantees ordering between cores/processors
>> within an SMP system. All memory accesses before the smp_mb() will be
>> visible to all cores within the SMP system before any accesses after
>> the smp_mb().
>> smp_rmb()
>> Like smp_mb(), but only guarantees ordering between read accesses.
>> smp_wmb()
>> Like smp_mb(), but only guarantees ordering between write accesses.
>>
>> So these made me total confuse .
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> 2011/12/9 trisha yad <trisha1march@gmail.com>:
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > I got bit confuse with below statement:
>> > This is from paper Memory access ordering Part 2
>> > SMP conditional barriers
>> > The SMP conditional barriers are used to ensure a consistent view of
>> > memory between different cores within a cache coherent SMP system.
>> > When compiling a kernel without CONFIG_SMP, all SMP barriers are
>> > converted into plain compiler barriers.
>> >
>> > 2011/12/9 ??? <buyit@live.cn>:
>> >> Hi :
>> >>
>> >> memory barriers can not make order on other cpus, only the current
>> >> cpu's order will be promised.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:54:40 +0530
>> >>> Subject: Memory barrier
>> >>> From: trisha1march at gmail.com
>> >>> To: Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>> I need small clarification on memory barrier.
>> >>> #define smp_mb() mb()
>> >>> #define smp_rmb() rmb()
>> >>> #define smp_wmb() wmb()
>> >>> In case of SMP:
>> >>> is smp_mb() or smp_rmb() make order on current CPU or all cpu's
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>> >>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>> >>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>

      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAGr+u+x0EFE+a424my7CqtBh449f=q0J_j=oGbyoKk4diUR2ng@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-09  7:24 ` Memory barrier trisha yad
2011-12-09  7:50   ` 卜弋天
2011-12-09  8:42     ` trisha yad
2011-12-09  8:44       ` trisha yad
2011-12-09 10:07         ` 卜弋天
2011-12-22 10:44           ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABV+yWsF66_dcSO479VBua=8b_sPwMNN2-oCF8r2ov9H9cXwSw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=murzin.v@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).