From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com (Mulyadi Santosa)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:59:21 +0700
Subject: Packet drop while using BPF filter
In-Reply-To: <CACPS-Pvn8T1Xm25485XmCe4im+NvtiGtgh7KPX4-iJEqbZ5ZGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACPS-PuMisxusXKsTVB8LxDKGbzjjTatQrp4RoED2a7sLzsZQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGdaadazM6WnSeGqt_EWNDCb9GNTE_P_6t4w1gV+81OTPemsTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACPS-Pvn8T1Xm25485XmCe4im+NvtiGtgh7KPX4-iJEqbZ5ZGw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGdaadZ-QkUMPvLbgXW_iJJzLW-X30YEYDLPRDXs1kTVRtuRKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Hi Mukesh

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:25, Mukesh Yadav <mukesh.fkd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mulyadi,
> Yeah that a final alternative.? Actually I was looking for some optimized
> way of getting packet filtered at kernel level using BPF filter.

You're welcome. Logically, your code should have no problem, but well
it seems that the implementation in BPF is not so good somewhere.

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com