From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com (Mulyadi Santosa)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:15:41 +0700
Subject: task_struct's real_parent vs parent members
In-Reply-To: <CAK3Ji10S8v8dPX7mx2-VXggMPA6piXNTVt5RGM=512=YgLYHCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK3Ji12BT7bm6N4Xk0_LRxu7cpF5Uvp5G9VDXhLbq9ekUQn8DQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGdaadbcX1CWbOau6TVYokPW7iVzMdYbt58W+w_J=Y=NAGfc2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK3Ji12-b+GpaQ8RVr7mZO7ThvE=7FthkRZW1DdDNh1R9pj79Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK3Ji10S8v8dPX7mx2-VXggMPA6piXNTVt5RGM=512=YgLYHCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGdaadb2m7-SSXVv=pAcZb10Fh0GWV8nbAO76XXr_pTxihgVpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:58, Vimal <j.vimal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mulyadi,
>
> You were right. ? I found this code, which is called from
> ptrace_attach function:
>
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/ptrace.c#L41


Phewwww :) Like I said.... i am getting rusty :) glad to help btw :D

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com