kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rpjday@crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: what is the rationale for all ethernet device vendors being "default y"?
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:44:34 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1605040844210.20421@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87twiekn9l.fsf@nemi.mork.no>

On Wed, 4 May 2016, Bj?rn Mork wrote:

> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> writes:
>
> >   just noticed that on my x86 system, when i do a:
> >
> >   $ make defconfig
> >
> > under "Ethernet driver support", all the top-level vendor choices
> > (3com, adaptec and so on) all have Kconfig entries with:
> >
> >   default y
> >
> > reasonably, for each vendor, all of their cards are not "default y"
> > (that would be kind of silly), but what is the logic behind making
> > each vendor selection "default y"?
>
> To avoid introducing build regressions with the introduction of these
> directories:
> http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2011/08/23/41
>
> This is because these directories were retro-fitted to the Kbuild system
> for most ethernet drivers.

  ah, makes perfect sense, thanks.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-04 12:07 what is the rationale for all ethernet device vendors being "default y"? Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-04 12:42 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-05-04 12:44   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2016-05-04 13:05   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1605040844210.20421@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).