From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058DBC433EF for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTocw-00040Y-3O; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:37:02 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTocu-00040K-7X for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:37:00 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTocr-00069d-Ei for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 18:36:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org From: Ian Pilcher Subject: "Disappearing" file in Documentation/ABI/testing Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:36:51 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org I am working on resubmitting a patch that adds an entry to Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block. That file does not exist in Linus's most recent tree. All (presumably) of the entries documented in that file have been merged into Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block. How should I handle this? Should my patch now add its entry to the "stable" file, or should it recreate the "testing" file? Thanks! -- ======================================================================== Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies