From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, bhe@redhat.com
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec/crash: no crash update when kexec in progress
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:21:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10c666ae-d528-4f49-82e9-8e0fee7099e0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v80lnf8d.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Hello Michael,
On 01/08/24 08:04, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> The following errors are observed when kexec is done with SMT=off on
>> powerpc.
>>
>> [ 358.458385] Removing IBM Power 842 compression device
>> [ 374.795734] kexec_core: Starting new kernel
>> [ 374.795748] kexec: Waking offline cpu 1.
>> [ 374.875695] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
>> [ 374.935833] kexec: Waking offline cpu 2.
>> [ 375.015664] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
>> snip..
>> [ 375.515823] kexec: Waking offline cpu 6.
>> [ 375.635667] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
>> [ 375.695836] kexec: Waking offline cpu 7.
> Are they actually errors though? Do they block the actual kexec from
> happening? Or are they just warnings in dmesg?
The kexec kernel boots fine.
This warning appears regardless of whether the kdump kernel is loaded.
However, when the kdump kernel is loaded, we will not be able to update
the kdump image (FDT).
I think this should be fine given that kexec is in progress.
Please let me know your opinion.
> Because the fix looks like it could be racy.
It seems like it is racy, but given that kexec takes the lock first and then
brings the CPU up, which triggers the kdump image, which always fails to
update the kdump image because it could not take the same lock.
Note: the kexec lock is not released unless kexec boot fails.
Thanks,
Sourabh Jain
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 15:27 [PATCH] kexec/crash: no crash update when kexec in progress Sourabh Jain
2024-08-01 2:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-08-01 6:51 ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2024-08-19 4:15 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-19 6:15 ` Baoquan He
2024-08-20 6:40 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-30 11:17 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-04 9:25 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-05 3:23 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-05 8:37 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-08 10:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-09 5:05 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-09 5:23 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-09 5:31 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-01 7:43 ` Baoquan He
2024-08-01 8:06 ` Sourabh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10c666ae-d528-4f49-82e9-8e0fee7099e0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sachinpb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox