From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: bwalle@suse.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make extended crashkernel= syntax less confusing
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 09:16:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209597390.7592.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080430112915.f56d8815.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2055 bytes --]
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:36:27 +1000 (EST)
> Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> > The extended crashkernel syntax is a little confusing in the
> > way it handles ranges. eg:
> >
> > crashkernel=512M-2G:64M,2G-:128M
> >
> > Means if the machine has between 512M and 2G of memory the
> > crash region should be 64M, and if the machine has 2G of
> > memory the region should be 64M. Only if the machine has
> > more than 2G memory will 128M be allocated.
> >
> > Although that semantic is correct, it is somewhat baffling.
> > Instead I propose that the end of the range means the first
> > address past the end of the range, ie: 512M up to but not
> > including 2G.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> > Acked-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
> > ---
> >
> > kernel/kexec.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> > index 6782dce..0ab5e33 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> > @@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_mem(char *cmdline,
> > }
> >
> > /* match ? */
> > - if (system_ram >= start && system_ram <= end) {
> > + if (system_ram >= start && system_ram < end) {
> > *crash_size = size;
> > break;
> > }
>
> I'm a bit surprised to see the code being updated but not the
> documentation. Were they out of sync before or are they out of sync after
> this patch or were they always in sync or what?
Well I think my patch makes the code match the documentation, but it
depends on how you interpret "between xM and yM".
Bernhard's patch to make it explicit is a good idea though.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 1:36 [PATCH] Make extended crashkernel= syntax less confusing Michael Ellerman
2008-04-30 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 21:57 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-05-01 0:16 ` Simon Horman
2008-04-30 23:16 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209597390.7592.4.camel@localhost \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox