kexec.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, greg@kroah.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:50:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384969851-7251-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384969851-7251-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>

I have added two more functions to walk through resources.
Current walk_system_ram_range() deals with pfn and /proc/iomem can contain
partial pages. By dealing in pfn, callback function loses the info that
last page of a memory range is a partial page and not the full page. So
I implemented walk_system_ran_res() which returns u64 values to callback
functions and now it properly return start and end address.

walk_system_ram_range() uses find_next_system_ram() to find the next
ram resource. This in turn only travels through siblings of top level
child and does not travers through all the nodes of the resoruce tree. I
also need another function where I can walk through all the resources,
for example figure out where "GART" aperture is. Figure out where
ACPI memory is.

So I wrote another function walk_ram_res() which walks through all
/proc/iomem resources and returns matches as asked by caller. Caller
can specify "name" of resource, start and end.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/ioport.h |    6 +++
 kernel/resource.c      |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 89b7c24..0ebf8b0 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -227,6 +227,12 @@ extern int iomem_is_exclusive(u64 addr);
 extern int
 walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
 		void *arg, int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *));
+extern int
+walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
+				int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
+extern int
+walk_ram_res(char *name, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
+				int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
 
 /* True if any part of r1 overlaps r2 */
 static inline bool resource_overlaps(struct resource *r1, struct resource *r2)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 3f285dc..5e575e8 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -59,10 +59,8 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock);
 static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bootmem_resource_lock);
 
-static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p)
 {
-	struct resource *p = v;
-	(*pos)++;
 	if (p->child)
 		return p->child;
 	while (!p->sibling && p->parent)
@@ -70,6 +68,13 @@ static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	return p->sibling;
 }
 
+static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	struct resource *p = v;
+	(*pos)++;
+	return (void *)next_resource(p);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 
 enum { MAX_IORES_LEVEL = 5 };
@@ -322,7 +327,71 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
 
-#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY)
+/*
+ * Finds the lowest iomem reosurce exists with-in [res->start.res->end)
+ * the caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags and "name".
+ * If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
+ * This walks through whole tree and not just first level children.
+ */
+static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, char *name)
+{
+	resource_size_t start, end;
+	struct resource *p;
+
+	BUG_ON(!res);
+
+	start = res->start;
+	end = res->end;
+	BUG_ON(start >= end);
+
+	read_lock(&resource_lock);
+	p = &iomem_resource;
+	while ((p = next_resource(p))) {
+		if (p->flags != res->flags)
+			continue;
+		if (name && strcmp(p->name, name))
+			continue;
+		if (p->start > end) {
+			p = NULL;
+			break;
+		}
+		if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))
+			break;
+	}
+
+	read_unlock(&resource_lock);
+	if (!p)
+		return -1;
+	/* copy data */
+	if (res->start < p->start)
+		res->start = p->start;
+	if (res->end > p->end)
+		res->end = p->end;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int walk_ram_res(char *name, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end,
+		void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
+{
+	struct resource res;
+	u64 orig_end;
+	int ret = -1;
+
+	res.start = start;
+	res.end = end;
+	res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+	orig_end = res.end;
+	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
+		(find_next_iomem_res(&res, name) >= 0)) {
+		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+		res.start = res.end + 1;
+		res.end = orig_end;
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Finds the lowest memory reosurce exists within [res->start.res->end)
  * the caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags and "name".
@@ -367,6 +436,37 @@ static int find_next_system_ram(struct resource *res, char *name)
 /*
  * This function calls callback against all memory range of "System RAM"
  * which are marked as IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
+ * Now, this function is only for "System RAM". This function deals with
+ * full ranges and not pfn. If resources are not pfn aligned, dealing
+ * with pfn can truncate ranges.
+ */
+int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
+				int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
+{
+	struct resource res;
+	u64 orig_end;
+	int ret = -1;
+
+	res.start = start;
+	res.end = end;
+	res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+	orig_end = res.end;
+	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
+		(find_next_system_ram(&res, "System RAM") >= 0)) {
+		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+		res.start = res.end + 1;
+		res.end = orig_end;
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY)
+
+/*
+ * This function calls callback against all memory range of "System RAM"
+ * which are marked as IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
  * Now, this function is only for "System RAM".
  */
 int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
-- 
1.7.7.6


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 17:50 [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] kexec: Export vmcoreinfo note size properly Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:59   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:08     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in kernel kexec Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:03   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:06     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:19         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:24           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 18:57           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-23  3:39             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 16:39               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-26 12:23                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-26 14:27                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-19 12:54                     ` Torsten Duwe
2013-12-20 14:19                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-20 23:11                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-20 23:20                           ` Kees Cook
2013-12-21 11:38                             ` Torsten Duwe
2014-01-02 20:39                             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-02 20:56                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-06 21:33                                 ` Josh Boyer
2014-01-07  4:22                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-20 23:20                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21  1:32                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-21  3:32                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21 12:15                                 ` Torsten Duwe
2013-11-21 19:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  1:03     ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22  2:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 20:42   ` Jiri Kosina
2014-01-17 19:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-29  3:10   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:27     ` WANG Chao
2013-12-02 15:44     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:35       ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:56   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04  8:19     ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:07   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:24       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-28 11:35   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:36     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call Vivek Goyal
2013-11-28 11:28   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:30     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:51       ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:20         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:41   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:07   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:46     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-21 19:14   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 23:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22  1:28   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22  2:35     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  2:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22  1:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  9:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 13:30       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 13:46         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:50           ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:33             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 17:45               ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22 13:43       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 15:33           ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:57             ` Eric Paris
2013-11-22 16:04               ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 16:08                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:34     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22 14:19       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 19:48         ` Greg KH
2013-11-23  3:23         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-04 19:34           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-05  4:10             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 10:04       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-25 15:36         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-25 16:15           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-22  0:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-22  2:03   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-03 13:23 ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384969851-7251-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).