From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Vneut-0006I9-JC for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:36:48 +0000 Message-ID: <1386034289.1791.210.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] efi: passing kexec necessary efi data via setup_data From: Toshi Kani Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:31:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1386023600.1791.201.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> References: <1385445477-9665-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <1385445477-9665-8-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131127140732.GD32267@pd.tnic> <20131129091415.GH4186@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <1386023600.1791.201.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, matt@console-pimps.org, greg@kroah.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, horms@verge.net.au, Borislav Petkov , ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, vgoyal@redhat.com On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 15:33 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 17:14 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > On 11/27/13 at 03:07pm, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:57:52PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > > Add a new setup_data type SETUP_EFI for kexec use. > > > > Passing the saved fw_vendor, runtime, config tables and > > > > efi runtime mappings. > > > > > > > > When entering virtual mode, directly mapping the efi > > > > runtime ragions which we passed in previously. And skip > > > > the step to call SetVirtualAddressMap. > > > > > > > > Specially for HP z420 workstation it need another variable > > > > saving, > > > > > > Why the special handling? Does that mean, this is going to be the case > > > for other HP UEFI implementations too? > > > > I have only one HP machine for testing, Maybe Toshi can help to verify > > on other machines. Just comment out the function efi_reuse_config to see > > if kexec kernel panic. > > My system (HP prototype server) did not need the special handling in > efi_reuse_config(). I will check with firmware team to get more > information on this. I have one question. I think this special handling assumes that efi.smbios contains a virtual address on HP z420. So, how does the 1st kernel set a virtual address to efi.smbios in the first place? Thanks, -Toshi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec