From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VoFdR-0001wE-Ie for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:49:14 +0000 Message-ID: <1386175428.1791.225.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] efi: passing kexec necessary efi data via setup_data From: Toshi Kani Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:43:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20131204024610.GA3764@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> References: <1385445477-9665-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <1385445477-9665-8-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131127140732.GD32267@pd.tnic> <20131129091415.GH4186@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <1386023600.1791.201.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <1386034289.1791.210.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20131203015613.GB3980@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <1386085140.1791.218.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20131204024610.GA3764@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, matt@console-pimps.org, greg@kroah.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, horms@verge.net.au, Borislav Petkov , ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, vgoyal@redhat.com On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:46 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > Hi, Toshi > > > Oh, I think I now understand what the issue was. The z420 firmware > > updates the SMBIOS table address in the EFI system table to a virtual > > address after calling EFI SetVirtualAddressMap. So, you are passing the > > original physical address of the SMBIOS table from the 1st kernel to the > > 2nd kernel to put it back to physical. Is that right? > > Right. Hi Dave, The z420 firmware is based on some UEFI core that may be used by other vendors as well. Since this handling is totally harmless (just redundant), I'd suggest not to have a platform check on this handling. Thanks, -Toshi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec