From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: horms@verge.net.au
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kernel probe function fixes
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:30:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391668244-13631-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> (raw)
During my testing for arm zImage, in 2nd kernel the atags pointer and the
machine_id are not valid, I did a lot of debugging in kernel, finally I found
this is caused by a kexec tools bug instead.
It is a regression since bf06cf2095. It changes uImage probe return values as
below:
* 0 - valid uImage type
* -1 - If the image is corrupted.
* 1 - If the image is not a uImage.
Because uImage will be probed before zImage, but the uImage probe return 1 for
a zImage thus kexec will mistakenly think it is ok to use as uImage.
IMHO, return -1 in case it's not an uImage is better instead of 1 like before
It's not really necessary to introduce a new return value. It might be better
for a new patch to return either 0 or -1 for uImage probe.
But I did not fix the uImage return value yet. In this patchset I did below:
- ppc64 zImage: return 0 instead of 1 in case of success
- strictly checking if probe return 0 in kexec.c
Tested arm zImage with use_atags only.
Dave Young (2):
zImage_ppc64_probe: return 0 instead of 1 in case of success
kernel image probe function return value checking fix
kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-zImage-ppc64.c | 5 ++++-
kexec/kexec.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 6:30 Dave Young [this message]
2014-02-06 6:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] zImage_ppc64_probe: return 0 instead of 1 in case of success Dave Young
2014-02-06 7:30 ` Simon Horman
2014-02-06 6:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel image probe function return value checking fix Dave Young
2014-02-06 7:30 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391668244-13631-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox