From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements From: Geoff Levand Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:33:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> References: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Hi Vivek, On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 12:59 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Does arm64 has secureboot? If yes, then it might make sense to > enable the new syscall kexec_file_load() on arm64 instead of trying > to make old syscall work first. Yes, arm64 should support secureboot, but I have not looked into it. When do you expect syscall kexec_file_load to get merged? I won't wait until then to push my current kexec work. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec