From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1412706539.32313.89.camel@smoke> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 From: Geoff Levand Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:28:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141007152219.GB27216@leverpostej> References: <20141001151947.GB14991@redhat.com> <1412370971.32313.30.camel@smoke> <20141007152219.GB27216@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" , Vivek Goyal , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 16:22 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > > > Does this patch series work with kexec on UEFI machines? > > > > I have not done much more than some simple re-boot tests using the > > base model (FVP_Base_AEMv8A-AEMv8A) and the Linaro 14.08 efi build, > > but yes, it should work. > > Where you booting the kernel as an UEFI application, or were you using the > Linux loader? The latter arguably isn't a UEFI boot because the kernel doesn't > know of or have access to UEFI (and arguably said laoder shouldn't even be > there). I used the Linux loader. > I've just had a go on Juno, but I wasn't able to get the tool to work. No, I wouldn't think it would. Proper UEFI re-boot is still todo. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec