From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1453324549.21755.10.camel@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13 From: Geoff Levand Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:15:49 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20160120025621.GC2999@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20160119123230.GB2904@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <1453248900.21755.8.camel@infradead.org> <20160120025621.GC2999@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: Mark Rutland , marc.zyngier@arm.com, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , AKASHI Takahiro , James Morse , christoffer.dall@linaro.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 10:56 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 01/19/16 at 04:15pm, Geoff Levand wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 20:32 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > Geoff, another question about kexec-tools part is, can the kexec > > > -tools code > > > been written in kernel? We have the infrastructure for > > > kexec_file_load. > > > > I see no technical reason why the arm64 kernel cannot support > > kexec_file_load. > > Cool, care to port it to kernel so that we have kexec_file_load only > in arm64 > we do not need to support both kexec_load and kexec_file_load? > I have no plans to do so. Feel free to submit a patch. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec