From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1456881475.6738.18.camel@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13 From: Geoff Levand Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:17:55 -0800 In-Reply-To: <56D5D763.4030304@codeaurora.org> References: <56D5D763.4030304@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Azriel Samson , catalin.marinas@arm.com, 'Will Deacon' , marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: 'Mark Rutland' , kexec@lists.infradead.org, 'AKASHI Takahiro' , james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virajm@codeaurora.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org Hi, On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 10:54 -0700, Azriel Samson wrote: > We have been using the kexec/kdump patches on ARM64 and would like to > use them from upstream. > > Assuming these are not going to be in Linux-4.5, a rebased set on > Linux-4.5 would be very useful. I'm waiting for one of two things to happen, either Marc Zyngier gives an ack for the patch 'arm64: kvm: allows kvm cpu hotplug', or the arm64 maintainers decide they will accept my proposal to merge kexec with a conditional in the Kconfig that only allows one of KVM or kexec to be selected. The kexec patches have been in review for 20 months now, with only minor changes in the past 15. I don't expect much would be gained in posting the kexec series again unless there is a chance they would be merged. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec