From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ima: based on the "secure_boot" policy limit syscalls
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:41:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523572911-16363-2-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523572911-16363-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The builtin "secure_boot" policy adds IMA appraisal rules requiring kernel
modules (finit_module syscall), direct firmware load, kexec kernel image
(kexec_file_load syscall), and the IMA policy to be signed, but did not
prevent the other syscalls/methods from working. Loading an equivalent
custom policy containing these same rules would have prevented the other
syscalls/methods from working.
This patch refactors the code to load custom policies, defining a new
function named ima_appraise_flag(). The new function is called either
when loading the builtin "secure_boot" or custom policies.
Fixes: 503ceaef8e2e ("ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring file signatures")
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index d89bebf85421..1bdb5bc57568 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -435,6 +435,17 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
}
+static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func)
+{
+ if (func == MODULE_CHECK)
+ return IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES;
+ else if (func == FIRMWARE_CHECK)
+ return IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE;
+ else if (func == POLICY_CHECK)
+ return IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* ima_init_policy - initialize the default measure rules.
*
@@ -473,9 +484,12 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
* Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to
* any other appraise rules.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list,
&ima_default_rules);
+ temp_ima_appraise |=
+ ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func);
+ }
for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list,
@@ -917,12 +931,9 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
}
if (!result && (entry->action == UNKNOWN))
result = -EINVAL;
- else if (entry->func == MODULE_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES;
- else if (entry->func == FIRMWARE_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE;
- else if (entry->func == POLICY_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ else if (entry->action == APPRAISE)
+ temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entry->func);
+
audit_log_format(ab, "res=%d", !result);
audit_log_end(ab);
return result;
--
2.7.5
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 22:41 [PATCH 0/3] kexec: limit kexec_load syscall Mimi Zohar
2018-04-12 22:41 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2018-04-12 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] kexec: call LSM hook for " Mimi Zohar
2018-05-02 13:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-02 14:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-02 15:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-03 15:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 16:05 ` Casey Schaufler
2018-05-03 16:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 21:06 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-03 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-12 22:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] ima: based on policy require signed kexec kernel images Mimi Zohar
2018-05-03 20:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] kexec: limit kexec_load syscall Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 20:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-03 21:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 22:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-03 21:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-03 21:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 21:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-03 23:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 2:29 ` Mimi Zohar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-11 1:36 Mimi Zohar
2018-05-11 1:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] ima: based on the "secure_boot" policy limit syscalls Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523572911-16363-2-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox