From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h64mn-0004R8-D1 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:47:32 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2J2hsMI027722 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:47:25 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rajud9xne-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:47:25 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:47:19 -0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Allow kexec_file() with appropriate IMA policy when locked down From: Mimi Zohar Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:47:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190318230315.232204-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> References: <20190318230315.232204-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1552963625.4899.3.camel@linux.ibm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Matthew Garrett , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Matthew Garrett , dhowells@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, dyoung@redhat.com On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 16:03 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Systems in lockdown mode should block the kexec of untrusted kernels. > For x86 and ARM we can ensure that a kernel is trustworthy by validating > a PE signature, but this isn't possible on other architectures. On those > platforms we can use IMA digital signatures instead. Add a function to > determine whether IMA has or will verify signatures for a given event type, > and if so permit kexec_file() even if the kernel is otherwise locked down. > This is restricted to cases where CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING is set > in order to prevent an attacker from loading additional keys at runtime. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett Acked-by: Mimi Zohar > --- > > Mimi, this relies on the lockdown patchset but I /think/ is independent > of the arch policy code - as a result I think it's possible to include > this in lockdown PR if that works for you, otherwise it can go through > your tree once the lockdown code is merged? Yes, please include this patch with the rest of the lockdown patchset. thanks, Mimi > > include/linux/ima.h | 9 ++++++ > kernel/kexec_file.c | 7 +++- > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 ++ > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h > index dc12fbcf484c..a78c04580a3c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ima.h > +++ b/include/linux/ima.h > @@ -132,4 +132,13 @@ static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, > return 0; > } > #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) && defined(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) > +extern bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id func); > +#else > +static inline bool ima_appraise_kexec_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id func) > +{ > + return false; > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE && CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING */ > #endif /* _LINUX_IMA_H */ > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c > index 0cfe4f6f7f85..8ffa4b75c620 100644 > --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c > +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c > @@ -240,7 +240,12 @@ kimage_file_prepare_segments(struct kimage *image, int kernel_fd, int initrd_fd, > > ret = 0; > > - if (kernel_is_locked_down(reason)) { > + /* If IMA is guaranteed to appraise a signature on the kexec > + * image, permit it even if the kernel is otherwise locked > + * down. > + */ > + if (!ima_appraise_signature(READING_KEXEC_IMAGE) && > + kernel_is_locked_down(reason)) { > ret = -EPERM; > goto out; > } > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > index cc12f3449a72..fe03cc6f1ca4 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct ima_kexec_hdr { > u64 count; > }; > > +extern const int read_idmap[]; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC > void ima_load_kexec_buffer(void); > #else > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > index 357edd140c09..927fe889201a 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id) > return 0; > } > > -static const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = { > +const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = { > [READING_FIRMWARE] = FIRMWARE_CHECK, > [READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER] = FIRMWARE_CHECK, > [READING_MODULE] = MODULE_CHECK, > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > index 8bc8a1c8cb3f..33e0b64305af 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > @@ -1337,3 +1337,53 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > return 0; > } > #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY */ > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) && defined(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) > +/* > + * ima_appraise_signature: whether IMA will appraise a given function using > + * an IMA digital signature. This is restricted to cases where the kernel > + * has a set of built-in trusted keys in order to avoid an attacker simply > + * loading additional keys. > + */ > +bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id id) > +{ > + struct ima_rule_entry *entry; > + bool found = false; > + enum ima_hooks func; > + > + if (id >= READING_MAX_ID) > + return false; > + > + func = read_idmap[id] ?: FILE_CHECK; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules, list) { > + if (entry->action != APPRAISE) > + continue; > + > + /* > + * A generic entry will match, but otherwise require that it > + * match the func we're looking for > + */ > + if (entry->func && entry->func != func) > + continue; > + > + /* > + * We require this to be a digital signature, not a raw IMA > + * hash. > + */ > + if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) > + found = true; > + > + /* > + * We've found a rule that matches, so break now even if it > + * didn't require a digital signature - a later rule that does > + * won't override it, so would be a false positive. > + */ > + break; > + } > + > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return found; > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE && CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING */ _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec