From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: jdmason@kudzu.us, kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au,
ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:34:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1972414.2B2S29ZK0k@skinner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140224152205.GC4631@redhat.com>
On Monday, February 24, 2014 10:22:05 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:58:41PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> [..]
>
> > > Approaches to avoid saved_max_pfn in calgary case:
> > > 1) If done correctly from the beginning, the TCE table size would have
> > >
> > > been exposed via /sys and kexec-tools could simply add:
> > > calgary="128k|512K...|8M" which is already caught by pci-calgary
> > > and
> > > saved_max_pfn is not needed/touched anymore.
> > > -> Disadvantage: needs a new sysfs entry
> > >
> > > 2) When finding max_pfn for calgary table size usage, we could try in
> > >
> > > kdump case to use the highest memory (RAM or RESERVED) showing up
> > > in e820 map.
> >
> > How could this replace saved_max_pfn? The highest memory in kdump can't
> > necessarily be the real ram size. In kdump, RAM range is just part of the
> > real ram, not mentioning we don't pass RESERVED range to kdump E820.
I expected you pass RAM that must not be used as RESERVED. Then, still
depending on which mem type is the last one, it might have worked.
> I vaguely remember there was some discussion about passing first kerne's
> RAM as special reserved ranges. Say E820_RESERVED_KDUMP. And use that
> to figure out saved_max_pfn.
>
> I personally feel that just create a new command line parameter
> "saved_max_pfn" and pass it to second kernel and be done with it. Modify
> calgary code to first look for saved_max_pfn and if not present, calculate
> saved_max_pfn from e820.
>
> saved_max_pfn command line option is pretty ugly, not sure what are the
> better options here.
It should be done like that:
The specified_table_size variable must be exported via sysfs.
If kexec-tools finds it existing it can pass in the table size via
boot param:
calgary=
(compare with calgary_parse_options() in arch/x86/kernel/pci-calgary_64.c).
Then the table size detection (for which saved_max_pfn is needed) would
fall off in kdump case.
If this really is supported/relevant, I can send something, but it
would need kexec-tools code as well.
Thomas
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 9:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cleanup: add dbgprint_mem_range function WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Store memory ranges globally used for crash kernel to boot into WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-02-27 20:53 ` Linn Crosetto
2014-02-28 8:32 ` WANG Chao
2014-02-24 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-24 14:58 ` WANG Chao
2014-02-24 15:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:34 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2014-02-24 15:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1972414.2B2S29ZK0k@skinner \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox