From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Hscsz-00035j-7F for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 06:55:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:54:42 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header. Message-ID: <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> References: <200704301717.08230.ak@suse.de> <20070501035539.GA15472@in.ibm.com> <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andi Kleen , vgoyal@in.ibm.com Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vivek Goyal [2007-05-01 07:06]: > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there. What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug? Thanks, Bernhard _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec