From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HsgfL-0004m2-Ge for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 10:57:49 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header. Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:57:26 +0200 References: <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705281657.26292.ak@suse.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Bernhard Walle Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 28 May 2007 12:54:42 Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Vivek Goyal [2007-05-01 07:06]: > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there. > > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you > didn't merge it? Yes, I was waiting for Vivek to figure that out. -Andi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec