From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: jlan@sgi.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [makedumpfile] config file -- OSRELEASE
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531085757.GA2585@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070530201328oomichi@mail.jp.nec.com>
Hello,
* Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> [2007-05-30 13:13]:
> 2007/05/29 21:30:58 +0200, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
> >is there any reason why the kernel version saved in the configuration
> >file is the version of the running kernel and not the version for
> >which the config file is for?
>
> The reason is that makedumpfile gets a running kernel's page_size as
> a 1st-kernel's page_size. If they are different, makedumpfile cannot
> analyze /proc/vmcore and it fails. So I think a configuration file
> should be created while 1st-kernel is running.
I also didn't find a possibility to get the page size from a kernel
image without running the executable.
> >It's a big problem because my plan was to ship the configuration files
> >with the kernel RPMs in SLES. However, we don't build the kernels on
> >systems which run the kernel that is just built -- so that's not
> >possible.
>
> It is a good idea to ship the configuration files with the kernel RPMs.
> I think you can do it with current implementation, because you need
> only one configuration file for one kernel image.
>
> I think you can ship configuration files as follows:
>
> 1. Build a kernel file and a debuginfo file.
> 2. Boot the system with the above kernel file.
> 3. Generate a configration file from a debuginfo file.
> 4. Ship the configration file with the kernel RPM.
>
> Any problem to follow the method above ?
No, that's not possible because it would change our whole build
process. However, I just replace the OSRELEASE now after generating
the config file with the kernel that's built and change the page size
according to the .config on IA64. That works for now. I know it's not
the best solution, but the only practicable for now.
Thanks,
Bernhard
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel. +49 (911) 74053-0
Maxfeldstr. 5 GF: Markus Rex
90409 Nürnberg, Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP DDAF6454: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-29 19:30 [makedumpfile] config file -- OSRELEASE Bernhard Walle
2007-05-29 19:46 ` Jay Lan
2007-05-30 11:13 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-05-31 8:57 ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2007-05-31 19:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-01 9:07 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-06-01 9:52 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-06-01 13:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-01 13:48 ` Bernhard Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070531085757.GA2585@suse.de \
--to=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox