From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IURu2-0005nO-EU for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:53:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:52:58 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [discuss] [patch 3/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on x86_64 Message-ID: <20070909185257.GA10600@suse.de> References: <20070909083914.065380136@strauss.suse.de> <20070909083914.951336895@strauss.suse.de> <86802c440709091027o32a63d11w629bad87abcc19c2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440709091027o32a63d11w629bad87abcc19c2@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal , "Eric W. Biederman" * Yinghai Lu [2007-09-09 19:27]: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > ... > > CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP? Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and I also wondered why, but I didn't change this because maybe there's some reason I don't know. Vivek, do you know why this was CONFIG_KEXEC? Thanks, Bernhard _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec