From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Timer interrupt lost on some x86_64 systems
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:19:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071112044903.GA6433@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071107140006.GC14371@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:00:06AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> I've been getting reports of some x86_64 systems that, on kdump kernel
> boot get stuck in calibrate_delay(), in both RHEL kernels and upstream kernels.
> The current thinking is that the lapic timer interrupt is no longer getting
> delivered, likely because we handle a crash condition on a cpu that isn't the
> boot cpu. One known offender is this motherboard:
> http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron8000/MCP55/H8QM8-2.cfm
> My current thought is that the TIMER_LVT entry is masked on all but the boot cpu
> on this system (which is strange, as I was under the impression that the timer
> interrupt was supposed to be enabled on all CPU's nominally.
I also thought that LAPIC timer interrupts are enabled on all cpus.
> At any rate, I was
> going to try to read/write the TIMER_LVT on the crashing processor before we
> jump to purgatory, or in purgatory itself, to see if that fixes the problem, but
I think calibrate_dealy() depends on external timer interrupt coming and
not the local APIC timer interrupt. Generally it is 8254 timer chip. Now a
days motherboards seems to be having HPET and I know somebody has reported
problems with HPET where HPET interrupts are not coming in second kernel and
system hangs in second kernel. I suspect that same might be the issue here.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-07 14:00 Timer interrupt lost on some x86_64 systems Neil Horman
2007-11-12 4:49 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2007-11-12 15:17 ` Neil Horman
2007-11-12 15:41 ` Neil Horman
2007-11-13 7:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-11-13 14:33 ` Neil Horman
2007-11-14 6:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-11-14 11:51 ` Neil Horman
2007-11-22 20:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-13 7:22 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071112044903.GA6433@in.ibm.com \
--to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox