From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: kexec -p loads
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:01:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080827190157.GF3694@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080827183413.GA22700@sgi.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:36:22AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > > * Vivek Goyal [2008-08-27 11:28]:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have this debugging output from my kexec:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cpw: elf_x86_64_load returning entry:0x1550
> > > > > > > cpw: after call to file_type[i].load: nr_segments:6 entry:0x1550
> > > > > > > kexec_load: entry = 0x1550 flags = 1
> > > > > > > nr_segments = 6
> > > > > > > segment[0].buf = 0x5237a0
> > > > > > > segment[0].bufsz = 7100
> > > > > > > segment[0].mem = 0x1000
> > > > > > > segment[0].memsz = 9000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > segment[1].buf = 0x52aaf0
> > > > > > > segment[1].bufsz = 1000
> > > > > > > segment[1].mem = 0xa000
> > > > > > > segment[1].memsz = 1000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think above two segments are not being loaded at right place. Looks like
> > > > > > kexec-tools decided to load first one at physical address 0x1000 and other at
> > > > > > physical address 0xa000. For crash kernel this is not right. It should
> > > > > > come out of reserved memory area and that's why you are encountering the
> > > > > > error.
> > > > >
> > > > > Relocatability in ELF image never worked on x86_64 because of GDB but
> > > > > (so the binary was marked as ET_EXEC instead of ET_DYN).
> > > > >
> > > > > You have to use bzImage for kdump in any case.
> > > >
> > > > True that vmlinux is not relocatable. But one can always compile the
> > > > vmlinux for a fixed physical address (Address in reserved region) and then
> > > > use it? In this case his vmlinux seems to have been compiled for physical
> > > > address 16MB. Which should be usable if there is a reserved memory region
> > > > at 16MB.
> > >
> > > Of course, that's true. I just thought when Cliff uses the same kernel
> > > for "kexec -l" and "kexec -p", then it's the "normal" kernel. But I
> > > didn't calculate the numbers.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Its litle tricky. I think one can always do both "kexec -l" and "kexec -p"
> > on a vmlinux which has been built for kdump (for reserved region).
> >
> > But one can not do "kexec -p" on normal kernel vmlinux.
> >
> > So I am assuming that Cliff is running into first case. But he can tell
> > us more.
> >
> > Cliff, is it same vmlinux which you use for first kernel or a different
> > vmlinux compiled for dump capture.
>
> Sorry for the lag. I was working on the problem and not watching my mail.
>
> I'm using two different kernels.
> The kdump vmlinux is compiled with
> CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
> CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x1000000
>
> I'm using kexec-tools-1.101
This is too old a version. Can you try the version 2.0.0. from following
link.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/horms/kexec-tools/kexec-tools.tar.bz2
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1KY6n1-00014H-Qi@eag09.americas.sgi.com>
2008-08-27 13:39 ` kexec -p loads Vivek Goyal
2008-08-27 13:43 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-08-27 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-27 15:30 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-08-27 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-27 18:34 ` Cliff Wickman
2008-08-27 19:01 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-08-27 19:23 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080827190157.GF3694@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox