From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6] helo=vavatch.codon.org.uk) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KyCkd-0003NH-3l for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:50:51 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:50:11 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] Revert "x86: default to reboot via ACPI" Message-ID: <20081106215011.GA6391@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1225915018-6548-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20081106143021.GD13023@elte.hu> <20081106150610.GA1644@elte.hu> <200811061853.08003.arvidjaar@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Len Brown Cc: Andrew Morton , Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Borzenkov , Avi Kivity On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 02:50:06PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > My expectation is that with the ACPI default, our problem > is working around a finite list of old machines that don't work; > while with the default KBD, our problem is working around > a potentially unbounded list of yet to be shipped machines > who may only be tested and work using the ACPI method. Does Windows default to using the ACPI method now? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec