From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
Bernhard Walle <bernhard.walle@gmx.de>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 23:03:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090807210306.GA25609@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1iqgze740.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
> As an initial approximation I would use a 32nd of low memory.
That means a 1TB machine will have a 32GB crash kernel.
Surely that's excessive?!?
It would be repeating all the same mistakes people made with hash tables
several years ago.
>
> That can be written to (with enough privileges when no crash kernel is
> loaded) reduce the amount of memory reserved by the crash kernel.
>
> Bernhard does that sound useful to you?
>
> Amerigo does that seem reasonable?
It doesn't sound reasonable to Andi.
Why do you even want to grow the crash kernel that much? Is there
any real problem with a 64-128MB crash kernel?
-Andi
>
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090805112123.6552.73574.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <m1eirqtmey.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <20090805140408.GJ7259@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
[not found] ` <m1skg5vpgg.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <4A7A3A78.7080200@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <m1y6pxr737.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <4A7A506B.2060008@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <m1ljlxsiox.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <4A7A70E5.2010204@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <m1bpmtqxjh.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <4A7A7A0F.6070906@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <m1iqh1nxv3.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <4A7A9E54.60705@redhat.com>
2009-08-07 19:50 ` [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-07 21:03 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-08-07 21:26 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-07 22:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-07 21:31 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-07 22:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-10 3:11 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090807210306.GA25609@basil.fritz.box \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox