From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Kdump issue with percpu_alloc=lpage
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:33:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091119143343.GB8741@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B03BD7A.9040500@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:25:14PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 10/29/2009 06:22 AM, John Blackwood wrote:
> >> Thanks Tejun. percpu_to_phys() makes sense to me also. John, would you
> >> like to post a patch for this.
> >
> > Hi Vivek,
> >
> > I'm probably not really NUMA/vm savy enough to attempt a patch
> > for approval at LKML.
> >
> > But maybe someone else more qualified can take up the cause.
>
> Is this still necessary for the current upstream where lpage allocator
> is gone (but vmalloc mapping is still there)?
>
Hi Tejun,
I did load a kdump kernel on 32-rc7 and it worked fine. But I guess in
this case memory might have come from linearly mapped region.
If the default per cpu allocator can get memory from vmalloc region also, then
I think we will need this function which can map virtual address to
physical address.
Are there multiple allocators now? If yes, what are the command line
options and I can try to use some other allocator and see if I can force
the condition where memory comes from vmalloc region and I observe the
crash.
Once I can reproduce it, I can also send you the fix you suggested.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 21:22 Kdump issue with percpu_alloc=lpage John Blackwood
2009-11-18 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-11-19 14:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-19 15:20 ` John Blackwood
2009-11-19 16:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 16:36 ` Vivek Goyal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-27 19:16 John Blackwood
2009-10-27 19:24 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091119143343.GB8741@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=john.blackwood@ccur.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox